the theory
#drawer/idea
its my theory inside my mind, probably someone all ready research it and im just think and wandering about it.
info is not distributed in area the same way. info is distributed uneven in a page, in mind, in the internet, in book and so on.
may i correct my self: the point of interest, of immense information, is not in all places and its also not in one place.
In one article, you might find that it contains almost no new information—perhaps the content is scattered or rehashes concepts you already know (I plan to explore this further later). In contrast, another article could present a vast amount of rich, insightful content. This leads me to believe that information is not uniformly distributed.
you may say well that obvious not all books are the same the same way not all batch of information are the same
well that lead me to couple of questions:
if you were able to spread all information (batch, sources, articles by any mean) connect them together (like obsidian notes by name of writers and there connection or by the information category) and of course give a score of the info helpfulness or tightens (how much information compere to word count).
how much you need to zoom out to get a smooth spread of the info and if will get smooth looking spread at all. maybe the spread of information will act like Fractal Zoom never ending in all direction.
we got to ask on the same page what consider smooth, this will be hard question on its own, leaning into open end question type and analog decision (meaning there is not an obvious point of what is smooth)
this [question] lead me to think on thinks entropy. in the way that everything strive to get to same level. one source may learn more how to organize and get higher score and maybe higher scored source tend to make is info less organize to match the level of the others. essentially saying why should i try so hard (i want to remind we chose to score to info sources by the word tightness and helpfulness)
overall this theory raise more question then trying to answer on them. its like thinking about exploring the stars without knowing how to get there in the first place. its nice idea to tease our brains
how can we know what is helpful info and what is not what info concentrated in the right way
this theory is here as a continuation or as a result of the [first one]
what define information written right. is it in precise calculation or is it in info distribution or is it in our brain. this jump to my head cause i ask: "well. the information I'm reading right now is not helpful to me, cause i already know it in different form, it just rearranged the idea little better and close holes of missing info. but what if this info, for anther person, is an immense amount of information and that exactly what he needed"
all this lead me to think that in the case of information we consume daily. news, books, movies, youtube, its really hard to give it a scale. but what if we gonna take it to different type of information.
information perceive the same way across all.
info which we can be measured.
like that in the worlds of physics and math.
but this is for anther paper.